Launched in 2012 in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Leonard & Bina Ellen Art Gallery’s Permanent Collection, the SIGHTINGS satellite exhibition program was conceived as an experimental platform to critically reflect upon the possibilities and limitations of the modernist “white cube.”

In 2015, the Gallery introduced a new yearly thematic program for SIGHTINGS. Following a first cycle of projects focused on the question of work/labour, the 2016-2017 edition addresses pedagogy, considered as a critical interface between the university, arts venues and social space. With this in mind, artists and curators are invited to use the spatial and conceptual structure of the SIGHTINGS cube to question the construction of knowledge inside and outside the academic “box.”

Curator: Katrie Chagnon

SIGHTINGS is located on the ground floor of the Hall Building at 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. West, and is accessible every day during the summer (including weekends) from 7 am to 11 pm, except on holidays.

(Post-)Truth on Display
Katrie Chagnon, (Post-)Truth on Display, 2017. Installation view
Katrie Chagnon, (Post-)Truth on Display, 2017. Installation detail. Photo: Paul Litherland
Katrie Chagnon, (Post-)Truth on Display, 2017. Installation view. Photo: Paul Litherland

June 29 – September 4, 2017

A project by Katrie Chagnon

With the participation of

Matthew Barker, Assistant Professor, Philosophy
Anne Beaudry, Associate Professor, Supply Chain and Business Technology Management; Director of the Graduate Diploma and Certificate in Business Administration
Guylaine Beaudry, University Librarian
Isabelle Benoit Gelber, Assistant Professor, Biology
Rosemary Collard, Geography
Bipin C. Desai, Professor, Computer Science & Software Engineering
Graham G. Dodds, Associate Professor, Political Science & Academic Director, Cooperative Education
Erin Gee, Assistant Professor, Communication Studies
Trevor Gould, Professor, Studio Arts

Nelson Henricks, Part-time Faculty, Studio Arts
Kregg Hetherington, Assistant Professor, Sociology and Anthropology
Satoshi Ikeda, Associate Professor, Sociology and Anthropology
Nora Jaffary, Assistant Professor, History
Shauna Janssen, Artist in Residency, Theater
Linda Kay, Professor, Journalism
Martin Lefebvre, Professor, Film Studies
John Locke, Professor, Film Studies
Bradley Nelson, Professor, Classics, Modern Languages and Linguistics
Norma Rantisi, Assistant Professor, Geography, Planning and Environment
Charles Reiss, Professor, Classics, Modern Languages and Linguistics
Ronald Rudin, Professor, History; Co-Director, Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling
Catherine Russell, Professor, Film Studies
Alan Shepard, President and Vice-Chancelor
Paul Shrivastava, Professor, Management
Eric Simon, Associate Professor and Chair, Studio Arts
Christine Stocek, Part-time Instructor, Art Education
Anthony Synnott, Sociology and Anthropology
Theresa Ventura, Assistant Professor, History
Haidee Wasson, Professor, Film Studies


Adorno, Theodor W. Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. Trans. E.F.N. Jephcott. New York: Verso, 2006 [1951].

Adorno, Theodor W. and Max Horkheimer. Dialectics of Enlightment: Philosophical Fragments. Trans. John Cumming. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002 [1944].

Ahmed, Sarah. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.

Aranowitz, Stanley and Henry A. Giroux. Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture, and Social Critism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.

Arendt, Hannah. Crisis of the Republic: Lying in Politics, Civil Disobedience on Violence, Thoughts on Politics, and Revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.

Arendt, Hannah. “Truth and Politics” (1967). In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, 227-264. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.

Baker, Erik. “Truth under Trump: Climate Change, Space Exploration, and ‘Politicized Science’.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), January 30, 2017. <>

Baudrillard, Jean. Simulations. New York: Autonomedia, 1984.

Bilgrami, Akeel. “Truth, Balance, and Freedom.” Social Reseach 76, no. 2, Free Inquiry at Risk: Universities in Dangerous Times, Part I (Summer 2009): 717-436.

Bois, Yve-Alain. “Fake News and Alternative Facts: Three Antidotes from History.” October, no. 160 (Spring 2017): 127-130.

Brecht, Bertold. “On Restoring the Truth.” October, no. 160 (Spring 2017): 137-142.

Brown, Wendy. “Untimeliness and Punctuality: Critical Theory in Dark Times.” In Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics, 1-16. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Carvalho, Tito. “Shifting Political Orders: ‘Post-Truth Politics’ in the U.K., U.S., and Brazil.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), January 30, 2017. <>

Castillo, David and William Egginton, eds. Medialogies: Reading Reality in the Age of Inflationary Media. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.

Chomsky, Noam. “A Special Supplement: The Responsibility of Intellectuals.” The New York Review of Books, February 23, 1967. <>

Chomsky, Noam. Language and Politics. Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1988.

Chomsky, Noam. Media Control – Post-9/11 Edition: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2008.

Chomsky, Noam. How the World Works. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2012.

Darnton, Robert. “La longue histoire des ‘fake news’.” Le Monde, February 21, 2017: 23.

David, Marian. “The Correspondence Theory of Truth.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. <>

Debray, Régis. Critique of Political Reason. Trans. David Macey. New York: NLB/Schocken Books, 1983.

Dewey, John. “My Pedagogical Creed.” School Journal 54 (January 1897): 77-80. <>

Dewey, John. “The Problem of Truth” (1911). In The Essential Dewey, vol. 2. Edited by Alexander, Thomas M. and Larry A. Hickman, 101-130. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.

Dummett, Michael. Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.

Enwezor, Okwui. “Documentary/Vérité : Bio-Politics, Human Rights and the Figure of ‘Truth’ in Contemporary Art.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art 5, no. 1 (2004): 11-42.

Evans, Brad and Bracha L. Ettinger. “Art in a Time of Atrocity.” The New York Times, December 16, 2016. <>

Farrell, Henry. “Facebook and Falsehood.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 15, 2017. <>

Fleck, Ludwik. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Trans. F. Bradley and T.J. Trenn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979 [1935].

Foucault, Michel. Discours et vérité précédé de La parrêsia. Paris: Vrin, 2016 [1983].

Foucault, Michel. “Truth and Power” (1976). In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings, 1972-1977. Edited by Colin Gordon, Trans. Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham and Kate Soper, 109-133. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.

Foucault, Michel. “La fonction vérité et les formes juridiques” (1974). In Dits et écrits 1954-1988, vol. II : 1970-1975. Edited by Daniel Defert and François Ewald with the collaboration of Jacques Lagrange, 109-114. Paris: Gallimard (nrf), 1994.

Lanzberg, Michael. “Truth.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. <>

Goodman, Nelson. “Art and Authenticity.” In Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, 99-126. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.

Gadamer, Hans Georg. Truth and Method. Trans. edited by Garrett Barden and John Cumming. New York: Seabury Press, 1975 [1960].

Goetz, Laura G. “‘Reoxygenating’ Research”. Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), February 25, 2017. <>

Harsin, Jayson. “Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies.” Communication, Culture & Critique, no. 8 (2015): 327-333.

Hetherington, Kregg. “The End of Truth Politics in Paraguay.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), May 4, 2017. <>

James, William. The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to ‘Pragmatism’. London: Longmans, Green, and co., 1970 [1909].

Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

Jasanoff, Sheila. “What Should Democracies Know?”. Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), March 28, 2017. <>

Jasanoff, Sheila. “A New Climate for Society.” Theory, Culture & Society 27, no. 2-3 (2010): 233-253.

Juhasz, Alexandra et Jesse Lerner (ed.). F is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth’s Undoing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.

Kennedy, David. “It’s Not About Facts. It’s About Politics.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), May 11, 2017. <>

Keyes, Ralph. The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2004.

Kitcher, Philip. Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Kleist, Heinrich von. “Primer of French Journalism.” October, no. 160 (Spring 2017): 131-136.

Koyré, Alexandre. “The Political Function of the Modern Lie.” October, no. 160 (Spring 2017): 143-151.

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago et Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 2012 [1962].

Kundera, Milan. Immortality. Trans. Peter Kussi. New York: HarperPerennial, 1992 [1990].

Kundera, Milan. The Umbearable Lightness of Being. Trans. Michael Henry Heim. London: Faber and Faber, 1985 [1984].

Lalonde, Normand. Autoportrait aux yeux crevés: aphorismes. Montreal: L’Oie de Cravan, 2016.

Latour, Bruno. « Comment ne pas se tromper sur Trump? ». Le Monde, November 12-13, 2016. <>

Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993 [1991].

Latour, Bruno. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2011 [1987].

Latour, Bruno. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.” Critical Inquiry 30, no. 2 (2004): 225-248.

Levitin, Daniel. Weaponized Lies: How to Think Critically in the Post-Truth Era. Londres: Penguin Books, 2017.

Lynch, Michael P. “Academic Freedom and the Politics of Truth.” In Philosophy and Academic Freedom. Edited by Jennifer Lackey. Oxford: Oxford University Press (upcomming). <>

Lynch, Michael P. “Post-truth, Alt-facts, and Asymmetric Controversies (Part I): Between Liars and Truthers.” February 6, 2017. Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), <>

Lynch, Michael P. “Post-truth, Alt-facts, and Asymmetric Controversies (Part II): Uncivil Epistemology.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), February 20, 2017. <>

Lynch, Michael P. “Post-truth, Alt-facts, and Asymmetric Controversies (Part III): The Truther Paradox.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), April 26, 2017. <>

Lynch, Michael P. The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data. New York: Liverite/W. W. Norton, 2016.

Lynch, Michael P., ed. The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009.

Lynch, Michael P. Truth as One and Many. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984 [1979].

Mata, Tiago. “Automatic for the People.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), May 4, 2017. <>

Menand, Louis, ed. The Future of Academic Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green Co., 1998 [1859].

Minh-Ha, Trinh T. “The Totalizing Quest of Meaning.” In When the Moon Waxes Red: Representation, Gender, and Cultural Politics, 29-50. New York: Routledge, 1991.

Misak, Cheryl. Truth and the End of Inquiry. A Peircean Account of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Morin, Edgar. Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Éditions Points, 2014 [1990].

Mouffe, Chantal. “Strategies of Radical Politics and Aesthetic Resistance.” Truth is concrete, September 8, 2012.<>

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. On Truth and Lies in an Nonmoral Sense. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015 [1873].

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. On Truth and Untruth: Selected Writings. Trans. and ed. by Taylor Carman. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2010.

Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four. Delhi: Kalpaz Publications, 2017 [1949].

Perdersen, Nikolaj J. L. L. et Cory D. Wright. Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Peters, Michael A. “Education in a post-truth world.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49, no. 6 (2017): 563-566.

Peirce, Charles S. “The Fixation of Belief.” Popular Science Monthly, no. 12 (November 1877): 1-15.

Phelan, Peggy. “Broken Symetries: Memory, Sight, Love.” In Unmarked: The Politics of Performance, 1-145. London and New York: Routledge, 2005 [1993].

Piattelli Palmarini, Massimo. La réforme du jugement ou comment ne plus se tromper. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob, 1995.

Pippenger, Nathan. “Know-Nothing Nation.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 15, 2017. <>

Popper, Karl Raimund. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge, 2002 [1934].

Porter, Theodore M. “Tweets of Fury.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), February 14, 2017. <>

Proctor, Robert and Londa Schiebinger (eds.). Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2008.

Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University. The Expertise and Public Trust Project. <>

Putnam, Hilary. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Putnam, Hilary. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Queneau, Raymond. Exercices de Style. Gallimard: Paris, 1982.

Rawls, John. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” The University of Chicago Law Review 64, no. 3 (Summer 1997): 765-807.

Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.

Roy, Ananya and Mia Greenwald. Truths About Trumpism. RogueMark Studios production, 6:28. Uploaded on January 18, 2017. <>

Schopenhauer, Arthur. The Art of Controversy. Trans. T. Bailey Saunders. New York: Macmillan, 1896.

Scott, Joan W. “Knowledge, Power, and Academic Freedom.” Social Research 76, no. 2, Free Inquiry at Risk: Universities in Dangerous Times, Part I (Summer 2009): 451-480.

Shomali, Alireza. Politics and the Criteria of Truth. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Sismondo, Sergio. “Post-truth?”. Social Studies of Science 47, no. 1 (2017): 3-6.

Sismondo, Sergio. “I Will Build a Great Swamp, and Nobody Builds Swamps Better than Me.” Program on Science, Technology and Society, Harvard University, First 100 Days: Narratives of Normalization and Disruption (blog), February 27, 2017. <>

Sloterdijk, Peter. Critique of Cynical Reason. Trans. Michael Eldred, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987 [1983].

Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers Abuse of Science. London: Profile Books, 1998 [1997].

Stengers, Isabelle. Power and Invention: Situation Science. Trans. Paul Bains. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.

Tallis, Benjamin. “Living in Post-truth: Power/Knowledge/Responsibility.” New Perspectives 24, no. 1 (2016): 7-18.

Tarski, Alfred. “The Semantic Conception of Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, no. 3 (March 1944): 341-376.

Time Magazine. “Is Truth Dead?”, Time Magazine, April 3, 2017.

Tobacco Industry Research Committee Recipient, “A FRANK STATEMENT TO CIGARETTE SMOKERS.” Published in over 50 major newspapers across the United States, January 4, 1954. <>

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Report of Canada. Volume One: Summary: Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future. Toronto: Lorimier, 2015.

Williamson, Ben, “Social media and public pedagogies of political mis-education.” code acts in education, November 16, 2016. <>

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961 [1921].

In his well-known reflection on the “political function of the intellectual,” Michel Foucault argues that truth, far from being “outside power, or deprived of power,” plays a fundamental role in the structuring and working of societies. In 1976, he wrote,

Each society has its regime of truth, its “general politics” of truth: that is, the types of discourse which it accepts and makes function as true; the mechanisms and instances which enable one to distinguish true from false statements, the means by which each is sanctioned; the techniques and procedures accorded value in the acquisition of truth; the status of those who are charged with saying what counts as true.1

Foucault’s understanding of truth thus highlights the authority that is historically attributed not only to scientific and academic discourses, but also to the institutions that produce it, namely, the universities and other great “apparatuses” of education, information, and political control. And yet, as Jayson Harsin has justly argued in his article “Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies,” (2015) this dynamic that links power to knowledge, and discourses to institutions, is currently undergoing a radical transformation as many contemporary societies have entered a new regime of truth that has been termed “post-truth,”2 “post-factual,” or, as the US humourist Stephen Colbert would say, of “truthiness.”

The adjective “post-truth,” Oxford Dictionary’s word of the year for 2016, “relat[es] to or denot[es] circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.”3 This phenomenon, which has been intensified by the Brexit campaign in the UK, Donald Trump’s presidential election in the US, and more recently the French presidential election, manifests itself not only through a proliferation of “alternative” facts circulated through new information networks that have been fragmented and personalized by algorithmic filter bubbles, but also through a growing indifference toward the very distinction between true and false. Recently, the realization of the detrimental epistemological and socio-political consequences of this massive disaffection toward truth has given rise to numerous positionings in different intellectual domains, including the history of sciences, philosophy, sociology, politics, information sciences, education, and art. In the wake of these reactions, we have also seen brought to the fore, once again, the crucial question of the pedagogical and critical responsibility of “intellectuals” toward “truth,” “facts,” and scientific “objectivity”4 – notions that had been discredited by the poststructuralist/postmodernist critique of positivism, of which Foucault was a prominent leader – in favour of a social constructivism and a kind of cognitive relativism,5 the fallout from which we are dealing with today.6

To close the 2016-17 cycle of SIGHTINGS centred on the theme of pedagogy, we thought that in this context, it was relevant – in fact, urgent – to broach the issue of (post-)truth as it reverberates in our environment, at the crossroads of the university and the art world, in addition to the large space it takes up in the mediascape. A number of questions arise in this direction: for instance, how do the new epistemic conditions underlying current “public pedagogy”7 transform academic teaching and research? How can academics, artists, and critics come out of their “bubbles”8 and contribute to the battle against disinformation, against the cultural production of ignorance and the resulting erosion of democracy? Which intellectual, ethical, social, and political standpoints is it possible – and desirable – to adopt in the present climate, in both the academic and artistic spheres, toward the “true” as a principle of knowledge? And what role can an artistic apparatus embedded in the university play in this interdisciplinary thinking?

Since the summer is a period of slowing down that lends itself particularly well to reading and meditation, we have decided to transform the SIGHTINGS cube into a display of books and articles that can be consulted freely by the university’s passers-by and users. The content of this open “library” is based on my research and the suggestions of members of the academic personnel (professors, deans, researchers, etc.) of different departments at Concordia. We asked them what they considered particularly relevant readings – or re-readings – for this specific historical moment in which we are experiencing such a marked crisis of truth. By moving a host of textual resources into a university public space, which, because it is occupied by an exhibition structure, also calls for an aesthetic appreciation, and by juxtaposing references generated by different disciplines (pure sciences, human and social sciences, communications, etc.), this installation invites a critical questioning of our present relationship between knowledge and power. The books and articles can be read on site or borrowed for a few hours, then brought back, based on trust. Moreover, each person is free to annotate and highlight passages, which will then be transcribed and archived on the Gallery’s website.

  1. Michel Foucault, “La fonction politique de l’intellectuel,” in Dits et écrits 1954-1988, vol. 3, 1976-79, ed. Daniel Defert and François Ewald, with the collaboration of Jacques Lagrange, Paris, Gallimard/nrf, 1994, p. 112. Translation in Michel Foucault, “Truth and Power,” in The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow, New York, Pantheon Books, 1984, p. 73.
  2. Jayson Harsin, “Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies,” Communication, Culture & Critique, 8 (2015), p. 327-33.
  3. Oxford Dictionaries, “Word of the Year 2016 Is…,” (accessed 9 May 2017).
  4. Sheila Jasanoff eloquently asks this question to the professors of future citizens in an article published on the First 100 Days blog of the Program on Science, Technology & Society of the Harvard Kennedy School. Sheila Jasanoff, “What Should Democracies Know?,” 28 March 2017. Online: (accessed 18 April 2017).
  5. On this topic, see Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont, Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science, London: Profile Books, 1998.
  6. Writers who had actively participated in the deconstruction of scientific objectivity, such as the sociologist of science Bruno Latour, are now voicing concerns in response to the excesses of post-factual discourse. Bruno Latour, “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matter of Fact to Matter of Concern,” Critical Inquiry, 30 (winter 2004), p. 225-48. For an interesting parallel between “post-truth” and “post-positivism,” see also Benjamin Tallis, “Living in Post-truth: Power/Knowledge/Responsibility,” New Perspectives, vol. 24, no 1 (2016), p. 7-18.
  7. That is, “the lessons that are taught outside of formal educational institutions by popular culture, informal institutions and public spaces, dominant cultural discourses, and public intellectualism and social activism.” Ben Williamson, “Social media and public pedagogies of political mis-education,” code acts in education, 16 November 2016. Online: (accessed 24 March 2017).
  8. Bruno Latour, “Comment ne pas se tromper sur Trump?,” Le Monde, 12-13 November 2016. Online: (accessed 24 March 2017).